<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When Automatic 401(k) Enrollment Is Bad</title>
	<link>http://advancedpersonalfinance.com/401k-enrollment/</link>
	<description>Moving beyond the basics</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 21:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://advancedpersonalfinance.com/401k-enrollment/#comment-3472</link>
		<author>Jeremy</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 19:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://advancedpersonalfinance.com/401k-enrollment/#comment-3472</guid>
		<description>Actually, the PPA specifically addresses many of the downsides to automatic enrollment that you mentioned. In order for a plan to pass nondiscrimination testing the automatic enrollment has to:

- Start off with a minimum of 3% contribution, and then increase by 1% automatically, without going higher than 10%

- The law now encourages the default investment option to be a balanced, or lifecycle type fund. This can preempt state laws and protect providers from lawsuits, which is the primary reason old automatic enrollment plans used a fixed fund as a default.

So, thanks to the PPA, in coming years new employees who are automatically enrolled will in most cases be starting at a 3% or higher contribution, automatically increase contributions by 1% each year, and be defaulted into an appropriate investment mix.

This doesn't apply to non-ERISA plans, but for the majority of people with auto enrollment, this will be a big help. Of course, it always pays to be involved with your plan, and save more and invest wisely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, the PPA specifically addresses many of the downsides to automatic enrollment that you mentioned. In order for a plan to pass nondiscrimination testing the automatic enrollment has to:</p>
<p>- Start off with a minimum of 3% contribution, and then increase by 1% automatically, without going higher than 10%</p>
<p>- The law now encourages the default investment option to be a balanced, or lifecycle type fund. This can preempt state laws and protect providers from lawsuits, which is the primary reason old automatic enrollment plans used a fixed fund as a default.</p>
<p>So, thanks to the PPA, in coming years new employees who are automatically enrolled will in most cases be starting at a 3% or higher contribution, automatically increase contributions by 1% each year, and be defaulted into an appropriate investment mix.</p>
<p>This doesn&#8217;t apply to non-ERISA plans, but for the majority of people with auto enrollment, this will be a big help. Of course, it always pays to be involved with your plan, and save more and invest wisely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuff Worth Reading, Because the Robot Uprising Is Near! &#124; Punny Money</title>
		<link>http://advancedpersonalfinance.com/401k-enrollment/#comment-3451</link>
		<author>Stuff Worth Reading, Because the Robot Uprising Is Near! &#124; Punny Money</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 15:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://advancedpersonalfinance.com/401k-enrollment/#comment-3451</guid>
		<description>[...] automatic things are usually done by robots. Advanced Personal Finance suggests you start with reconsidering automatic 401(k)s so your retirement isn&#8217;t threatened by android [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] automatic things are usually done by robots. Advanced Personal Finance suggests you start with reconsidering automatic 401(k)s so your retirement isn&#8217;t threatened by android [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
