The Great Shrinking Emergency Fund

There’s near unanimity in the belief that you should have a cash emergency fund.  The problem with that supposedly inviolate rule is that in low interest times like we’re now in, your emergency fund gets smaller and smaller every day.  I advocate alternatives to the large emergency fund thesis.

In times of low interest rates and high inflation, there’s an awful effect for savers - negative real interest rates.  Like a job where you never get a raise, negative real interst rates happen when your income (in this case from interest on your savings) declines after the effects of inflation.  For a recent example, consider that in a typical ‘high-interest’ savings account, you are offered 3%.  With official CPI running at 4%, you’re losing 1% of your emergency savings in real purchasing power terms.  To make things worse, I haven’t even included the effect of taxes on those interest payments.  To make things much, much worse, I’m using the CPI put out by the federal government which many, including myself, think is a fiction.  (I believe true inflation is much higher and if you’ve bought food, gas, health care, or day care recently, I think you’d agree.  See Shadow Stats for more information.)

The bottom line is if you have a cash emergency fund, it gets smaller in real terms every day.

Fine, you say, but a 1% decline isn’t so bad.  And besides, what’s the alternative?  I think there are two decent alternatives to an ever-shrinking emergency fund - a fully-funded Roth IRA and ready credit.

Among the great features of a Roth IRA is its withdrawal rules.  Without getting into all the various tax treatments for withdrawals before retirement, for our purposes you only need to know one thing.  You can always get access to your initial investment.  That is, if you fully fund a Roth IRA in 2008, you can always get at your $5,000 initial investment without tax or early withdrawal penalties.

With that in mind, I think a Roth IRA is a very good vehicle for emergency savings (beyond a small to medium size cash account for ‘mini-emergencies’ like car repairs).  You can invest the money with an eye toward growth (i.e. not in a passbook savings account) that should earn a higher return.  But in a true emergency, you can still access the money.  When the emergency passes, you can begin putting the money back into the Roth (for that year only).

The second alternative to a large emergency savings account is ready credit.  Some people will recoil in horror at the thought of using credit in any form as an emergency fund.  But I believe ready credit can make an excellent emergency backstop.  I’d call any widely-accepted revolving credit line ‘ready credit.’  Examples are unused credit card balances and HELOCs.

The great advantage to using ready credit as an emergency backstop is that it puts the interest rate risk onto the bank.  They bear the 1% loss you’d incur if you saved as in my example above.  (Mind you, the bank doesn’t actually suffer a loss.  They obviously invest that money into higher-than-inflation investment vehicles.)

The disadvantage to this technique, and it is admittedly a big one, is the possible sudden loss of those credit lines just when you need them.  Recently, people have experienced a decreasing credit line on their credit cards.  And in the event of a job loss, banks are known to pull or reduce HELOCs.  I don’t deny this is a problem.  However, I would point out that not all emergencies involve the loss of a job (the most common reason for a loss of credit).  Examples of situations where you’d want access to a good bit of money without having lost your job abound.

Do I think you should abandon a cash emergency fund?  No.  I just think, ideally, the ‘emergency fund’ should actually be a set of concentric rings around you.  Closest to you is money kept for day-to-day expenses and any extra in a checking account.  Beyond that is a smallish cash emergency fund.  Beyond that is ready credit and/or saleable investments.

What do you think?  What’s your emergency fund technique?

This post only published at Advanced Personal Finance.

If you enjoyed this post, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed.

This entry was posted on Tuesday, May 13th, 2008 at 7:45 am and is filed under Inflation, Investments. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

7 Responses to “The Great Shrinking Emergency Fund”

  1. north wales holiday Says:

    links from TechnoratiThat once in a lifetime holidayWokingham Times,?UK?- 1 hour agoTsavo is a national park the size of Wales and is much greener, with orange soil, in comparison to Lewa. The scenery here though is just as striking and … Originally posted here:That once in a lifetime holiday - Wokingham Times

  2. Emergency Fund Options | HarvestingDollars Says:

    […] several of my fellow bloggers had some interesting comments on Emergency funds, including Advanced Personal Finance and Frugal Dad. Please take a look at both of these posts, as they show two completely different […]

  3. Ricardo Bueno Says:

    I agree with the ready-credit strategy… Unfortunately, I’ve seen many people abuse it (meaning that they didn’t have the discipline to utilize those reserves towards items categorized as “emergency expenses”).

  4. Monty Loree Says:

    Money is money. If you have $5000 saved up in an emergency fund that is going to help you. It’s a tool to use in case of emergency.

    Many people don’t have any money saved up and have nothing to fall back on. Using credit ready in this situation is WRONG.

    You have to save for retirement anyways. It’s more of the mind set to put money away that people have to cultivate.

  5. Pamela Grundy Says:

    Saving money is still a good idea. The emergency fund is even more important now because jobs are so uncertain and natural disasters have been ramping up lately too. I recommend that in addition to savings, people keep enough cash on hand–say two or three hundred dollars–to get them through a few days just in case of, who knows? I work at a bank part-time. Trust me, things go wrong.

  6. Monty Loree Says:

    I agree with Pamela…

    Countries with no social nets have higher rates of savings. Because they have to take care of themselves. We’re too reliant on government social nets, and credit card social nets.

    The more money you have saved up, the more self reliant you will be.

  7. Chief Family Officer Says:

    Personally, I hate the idea of risking my emergency fund. So unless you’re talking high-interest savings account within the Roth, your suggestion simply scares me. The whole point of an emergency fund (at least of mine!) is peace of mind, and I wouldn’t have that if there was a chance of losing my EF in a mutual fund in a Roth. As for credit, I think during a true emergency like a job loss, it simply causes more stress. So I wouldn’t go that route myself.

Leave a Reply

Related posts:

Close
E-mail It